The “Pepper Spray Incident” and the Inevitable Radicalization of the UC Student Body

When I watched Lt. John Pike and the University of California Davis Police Department violently attack our peaceful demonstration against social inequality and austerity on Friday, I was overwhelmed by the enormity of the situation.

There is no dearth of personal recollections of this weekend’s events circulating the internet as the “pepper spray incident” and Chancellor Linda Katehi’s “walk of shame” have made UC Davis the center of international attention and outcry. In light of this, it is more important to consider the implications of these events and what they mean for the growing global movement against social inequality. Particularly, it is important to recognize the historical importance of the past week’s profound radicalization of students in the UC system and across the nation. The entrance of an organized student movement into the current social situation has deep implications, and they should be considered as the movement goes forward.

The video that has now gone viral speaks volumes and there is no need to romanticize the moments in great detail. My friends and I were approached by a small army of thugs, who violently attacked some of the kindest, most intelligent, most caring people I have ever met. I was not as brave as my friends who made history by refusing to yield to the police goons, and I have to admit that after watching their bodies react, I do not regret falling back. I saw hard working, compassionate students and teachers violently vomiting, weeping, and holding each other as that disgusting orange goo ran down their teary faces. I saw hundreds of students pour out of classrooms and the library to come to our defense. I saw the police turn tail and flee after seeing the looks of fury in our eyes. I saw the looks in their eyes, too—looks of genuine fear. I’d never seen that before in a police officer’s eyes.

So, what role will California college students play in the Occupy movement? As the worldwide revolt against social inequality continues despite the deeply disturbing intentions of the wealthiest among us to suffocate the movement, the students now have an incredibly important role to play. With the original occupiers on the East Coast forced by the cold weather and brutal police raids to reclaim less visible, unused property, the West Coast is responsible for sustaining and building the movement until spring.

And UC and CSU students are ready to rise to the occasion. 10,000 of us gathered in Berkeley last Tuesday, 2,000 here in Davis on the same day, and an Occupy camp has been set up at UCLA. Hundreds of UC students converged in downtown San Francisco last week and succeeded in shutting down a Bank of America. CSU students forced the CSU Board of Trustees to secretly flee their original meeting spot before passing another round of fee increases. UC leadership cancelled the UC Regents’ meeting last week out of fear that it would be shut down by student protestors.

The participation of thousands of students across the state in the anti-Wall Street movement represents the rapid radicalization of California students, which in itself is indicative of the quick move to the left by millions of movement sympathizers. The radicalization of the students manifests itself on the busses, in the restaurants, and in the coffee shops on and around my campus, where discussion of political strategy dominates. Of course, these anecdotes mean relatively little—but the politicization of the student body is significant nevertheless. Though the process of politicization is experiencing its birth pangs, it is emotionally moving that the process has finally begun.

This radicalization must continue to be channeled into a starkly anti-capitalist political tendency. Objective material conditions are ensuring that liberal elements of the student body will be drowned out. This is a huge break from the Free Speech Movement of the mid-60s, and even from the anti-Vietnam War movement that followed. Youth unemployment in the United States is above 20% – higher than in some “Arab Spring” countries. We’ve seen the statistics about wealth inequality: the top 1% controls the same amount of wealth as the bottom 90%. Only 40% of college students graduate, and for those that do, they enter the workforce with an average debt-load just under $30,000.

And then what? A minimum wage Starbucks job at $8.50 an hour? Perhaps most importantly, though, is the current rollback of nearly every major social gain won by the working class since the 1930s. Even in the midst of the Vietnam War, after all, President Johnson’s “Great Society” at least recognized that social inequality existed and that the most impoverished Americans were worthy of minuscule levels of government support.

At least our parents got “Guns and Butter”. Now we’re stuck with just the guns.

Today, the contrasts couldn’t be starker. President Obama has escalated the war on the working class by continuing the decades-long trend of drastically slashing social services. In fact, Obama has promised to out-do the GOP in the race to see who can slash more services to deal with the massive debt our country has accumulated from years of war and tax breaks for the wealthy. He has proposed gutting services that tens of millions of Americans rely on for survival: Social Security, Medicare, SNAP, WIC, etc. The cynical Manipulator-in-Chief has invaded new countries, illegally murdered American citizens abroad, and expanded the War on Terror into Libya, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia.

I spent a year working as a volunteer on Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. I was drawn to his candidacy by his promises to serve “Main Street, not Wall Street”, to close Guantanamo Bay, to end the wars, to stop the mass deportation of undocumented families, and to roll-back the PATRIOT Act and the rest of the unconstitutional post-9/11 national security apparatus. I, like many in my generation, naively thought that a candidate that was backed by Wall Street could still make “change”.

Barack Obama has delivered on exactly none of these promises. In fact, the ruling class could hardly ask for a better leader. Corporate profits have soared during his presidency, as unemployment remains stiflingly high with no signs that the economy will add jobs at a rate quick enough to keep up with population gain. It makes me furious that the candidate to whom I dedicated a year of my life has turned on me. I take it very personally. I am not the only 21-year-old who feels this way. I also served the President’s political party for a year following his election. I was an elected delegate to the California Democratic Party, and was a staffer for a statewide Democratic campaign. But the Democratic Party is leading the attack on working people across America.
Democratic Governor, Jerry Brown, for example, seems like he’s trying to out-do Scott Walker in imposing austerity on the indigent and the young. Democratic mayors across the country are ordering riot police on their own peaceful protesters. In the bay area, “progressive” Democrats like Jean Quan and Ed Lee have ordered riot police to evict occupiers on multiple occasions. These liberal champions ordered police to beat Iraq War Veterans Scott Olson and Kayvan Sabehgi.

Today, no solution to the social crisis can be found through either of the two big-business parties. This is why the burgeoning student movement in California represents a great hope for the anti-capitalist position. In light of this, demands for Chancellor Katehi’s resignation should be considered only as a show of our power. In reality, even if we are to succeed in ousting Katehi,
her replacement would be no different.

We students can re-shape the future of public education in California only by abolishing the UC Regents, CSU Board of Trustees, and their respective police forces. Democratic student, worker, and faculty control of the entire decision-making process is needed to reverse the trends towards privatization, debt, and austerity.

And we should also remember that the crisis in higher education is a symptom of the crisis of capitalism. The American student movement of the late 60s, for example, failed to prevent the attack on the working class that has been carried out by Democrats and Republicans throughout the 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s, and 2010s because it failed to self-consciously establish itself as a movement against capitalism.

This belies the issue of “no politics” that is such a popular refrain for liberals taking part in the Occupy movement today. “No politics” has been our strategy for 40 years, and look what it has gotten us! Back to UC Davis— I have read multiple accounts on the events of the past days that emphasize how UC Davis is a turning point for the Occupy movement. Images of the blatant police brutality and the powerful silence that met the Chancellor when she left her botched press conference have terrified and inspired millions. But this isn’t an unprecedented show of violence, and police brutality isn’t a new phenomenon. The events of the past days are a glimpse of reality, not a break from the past. Though it has taken a viral video to make this clear to many, it is an important fact to remember.

The images from Davis, Berkeley, Chapel Hill, New York, Oakland, Denver, and countless other cities and towns across the country have galvanized support for the movement and have even further embedded Occupy Wall Street as a facet of American political life. The images have also revealed democracy in America for just what it is: a façade.

In light of this, students at UC and across the country must prepare ourselves for the coming struggle. The police attacks will not abate—they will only grow in intensity. Our debt load will grow, unless we reject the concept of debt as required by capitalism. Fee hikes will continue until we reject the very idea of paying for school. We should fight for something radically different—a society where production is managed based on social need and human rights to housing, food, education, transportation, and physical security. One where our friends, brothers, sisters, and parents aren’t sent off to die in unnecessary wars. One where speculators and bankers are treated like the criminals they are.

The lines in the sand are being drawn on my campus and across the country. Students, ask yourselves: Which side are you on?

 

 [Point of clarification: I write this as an individual and in no way as a spokesperson for any group.]

Eric Lee is a 4th year undergraduate at the University of California, Davis.

9 Responses to

  1. Jennifer Podvin

    Hello Eric,

    Great article. I just wanted to let you know that UC Davis is us…you are supported. My community College (College of Marin) held their first General Assembly today and established an Occupy group on campus. One of our main proposals was to stand in solidarity with UC Davis and Berkeley. We also proposed that we need to network with other colleges and universities and community colleges across CA. Together we are strong, and I agree that it is up to us now that encampments are being torn down and winter is coming. Let’s keep it up, never quit and show our elders that we are a generation that is capable of making big changes. Thanks.

    Best,
    Jen Podvin

  2. Nancy Schimmel

    I was a graduate student at UC Berkeley during the Free Speech Movement and went out on strike after the 800+ arrests. My generation had already been radicalized by the San Francisco police using firehoses to wash people–mostly students–down the stairs of City Hall during the House Un-American Activities hearings of 1960. The brutality of the FSM arrests four years later radicalized another crop. It looks like the same policies are in effect now, and having the same result.

    In the sixties, many of us were engaged in struggles for civil rights, civil liberties and an end to a hopeless war. But the economy was going well and we knew we could find jobs easily when we got our degrees. Now students are again becoming engaged in a struggle for civil rights, civil liberties and an end to two hopeless wars, but in addition, you are looking at the economics behind the curtain. You are seeing that the wars and the prison systems are sources for profit at the expense of services to people oppressed or in need, and that education is being increasingly privatized as well. I live in Berkeley and I’ve taken part in a few meetings and events on campus in the past weeks. I am impressed and heartened by what I see.

    P. S. I have been participating as a singer (in a group called Occu-pella) and songwriter in Occupy Cal, Occupy Berkeley, and Occupy Oakland. If songs are coming out of the campus community, I’d like to know about them. There is a facebook page called Occupy Songs & Poems where you can post singing events and links to songs. I believe singing together can make us both more brave and more peaceful.

  3. John

    ” The American student movement of the late 60s, for example, failed to prevent the attack on the working class that has been carried out by Democrats and Republicans throughout the 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s, and 2010s because it failed to self-consciously establish itself as a movement against capitalism.”
    First off, by the late 60’s the Vietnam war had ramped up to the point that that’s what pretty much all the young people were focusing on, they were spending efforts to stop the war. Also, it was the reality at the time of the FSM (1964, long before the ‘late 60’s’) that the hippie movement (THE anti-capitalists of the time), the Civil Rights Movement and the students were all very separate, that does that represent any failure; that’s just where society was. It was incredible what the students accomplished, but it is essential to realize freedom of speech was the battlefield of that time and place (school), and took all their efforts to accomplish their victory. It was the fight against the war that made it able for these diverse movements to unite at that time in history. It was just not possible to focus primarily on the problems of capitalism if you don’t have the right to free speech or you’re being shot by cops because of your skin color, or you’re being shipped off to war.

  4. Phil

    “…by refusing to yield to the police goons.”

    What did you expect them to do? Who are you to disobey the law and take over something which is not yours? You may not agree with the police, but it is not your decision to make; you can make your claim in court. Obviously you were breaking at least one law and were trying to agitate the police, to make them enforce the laws of your city and campus. Sorry to say, but when any logical person breaks it down and thinks about it, I think most would expect to get pepper sprayed at the VERY LEAST if they flat out disobeyed the police, especially in a way as disrespectful and egregious as this was. How about next time, once you know you have already exhausted your welcome and the police tell you to stop blocking the PEOPLES’ sidewalk, not YOURS and you do not speak for me or a majority of America, but next time, STFU and follow the norms this society has set in place for you to obey, and obeying the police is one and when you break that, people will more than likely side with the police.

  5. ab

    @ Phil
    If there are norms of society, they should also contain the police.

    Further, the People do not side with the police when the police assault without restraint. In fact, the actions transcend any norm and should be investigated.

    When ret. Philadelphia police captain Ray Lewis was arrested, he called the cops ‘workers for the 1 per cent and they don’t even realise it.’

  6. Sparty

    face it…it was news. WAS.

    now its a meme.

    something for people to make funny photoshops with.

    no one even cares in the bay area anymore

  7. Kendb

    December 23, 2011
    US troops are now out of Iraq thanks to President Obama. For me he has fulfilled all his required tasks, everything else is gravy. Thank you Barack, your Nobel is in the mail. Let’s hope the billionaire fake mayor of NY, NY decides our troops deserve their ticker tape parade…