Categories
Communiqués

October 7 – Virtual Sit-In (UPDATE)

////UPDATE////

Go to the following link to directly join the virtual sit-in: http://occupyeverything.com/action

or to host a mirror site follow the instructions below.

_________

from http://october7thecd.wordpress.com/

In solidarity with the October 7th Day of Action for Public Education we call for a virtual sit-in of the websites of the Office of the President of the University of California and the UC Regents. This virtual sit-in will take place for all of October 7th, from 12:00AM the night before to 11:59PM the night of.

Download the attached file and help this action happen by hosting it on your server. Or just use it locally on your computer for all of October 7th.

Because wordpress doesn’t allow tgz files, download this pdf and rename it to tgz, then extract it to get the files.

oct7-vsitin4

Categories
Communiqués

Occupying Editor 02: Marc Herbst

For the next few weeks, writer, artist, and cultural organizer Marc Herbst will occupy this site. Marc works across disciplines (in Media, Social Sciences, the Arts and Academia) in order to actively research how to practically use cultural production for radical and progressive ends (and to earn money). He recently completed a comic book series that points the way toward a post-individualist fashion and includes a theoretical text by British art historian Gavin Grindon.
He is a co-editor of the Journal of Aesthetics & Protest. Though based in Los Angeles, he is currently living in Leipzig with journal co-editor Christina Ulke.

Categories
Communiqués

October 7th Day of Action for Public Education

/////// PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY /////////

In solidarity with the October 7th Day of Action for Public Education [http://occupyca.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/strike-on-october-7th/] we call for a virtual sit-in of the websites of the Office of the President of the University of California and the UC Regents. This virtual sit-in will take place for all of October 7th, from 12:00AM the night before to 11:59PM the night of.

We need hosting for this action. Please contact any of us if you can provide hosting for the html files for the action.

Recent actions taken on March 4th by students, faculty, staff and allies around the world were joined online by a virtual sit-in. The swift and violent response to the virtual sit-in from the UC administration and police against Ricardo Dominguez only reveal the effectiveness of the action and must be seen as part of a larger strategy of the criminalization of resistance including the arrest of hundreds of faculty, students and staff around the world who are struggling to redefine what the future of education will be. The UC continues to make efforts to expand the prison-military-education-industrial complex in the face of demands, occupations, strikes and blockades by those willing to put their bodies, physically and digitally, on the line for a better future for education.

By organizing this action, in the tradition of ECD as a distributed tactic as performed by the Electrohippies, the Federation of Random Action and the borderlands Hacklab, we are demonstrating that the hydra has a million heads and Yudof, the Regents and their police cannot stop Electronic Civil Disobedience by putting their boot on the neck of one man. A virtual sit-in is a mass action by thousands of people and we will not be stopped.

More virtual strikes can be expected until:

* The budget cuts across the UC system are turned back
* Those laid off in the past year are rehired
* Charges are dropped and investigations ended against all of those arrested for struggling for the future of their education

Join the actions in the streets, the campuses and the university buildings if you can. If you want to join the virtual sit-in, go here for a list of urls:

http://october7thvirtualsitin.wordpress.com

If you have any questions about this e-action contact:

(alphabetical)

Zach Blas, zachblas@gmail.com
Xandre Borghetti
Micha Cárdenas, azdelslade@gmail.com
Elizabeth Chaney, chaneyeh@gmail.com
John Falchi, pacerjp14@sbcglobal.net
Autumn Hays, autumnhays@ymail.com
Linzi Juliano
Rashne Limki
Bradley Litwin
Benjamin Lotan, benjaminlotan@gmail.com
Luis Martin-Cabrera
Elle Mehrmand, ellemehrmand@gmail.com

If you would like to help organize the action and be added to the list of organizers, email us.

/////// PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY /////////

Categories
Communiqués

Join the Socialist Contingent

September 28, 2010

http://socialistworker.org/2010/09/28/join-the-socialist-contingent

We March for Jobs, Peace, Justice and the Socialist Alternative That Can Win Them

Hundreds of thousands of Americans organized by labor and civil rights organizations will gather in Washington, D.C., on October 2 to demand a change in the direction that our nation is heading.

We are proud to join this march to demand jobs, to demand an end to the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and for a society that is fairer, more equal and more just. We believe it important to be in the capital on that date to help create a counterweight to Glenn Beck, the Tea Party and Republicans, their reactionary politics, ruthless economics and their racism.

We do not, however, share the goals of the AFL-CIO, the NAACP and other organizations which hope to achieve jobs and justice by supporting Barack Obama and the Democratic Party in the national elections on November 2.

We believe that it has become quite clear now that neither Democrats nor the Republicans are capable of solving the country’s three great crises–the economy, the environment and the wars–in a way that will be good for the American people. The goals of a full-employment economy, real environmental sustainability and peace cannot be achieved by our capitalist system and the corporations motivated only by profit. We need a new direction toward a new system.

What you can do

Join the Socialist Contingent at the One Nation rally. Meet up on Saturday, October 2, 2010, at 10 a.m. at 12th and Constitution (NW), Washington, D.C.

Contact organizers by e-mail to endorse the contingent.

Following the rally, join activists at a meeting on “Socialism for the 21st Century” featuring Dan La Botz, Keaanga-Yamahtta Taylor and others.

For information and updates about the contingent, go to the Socialist Contingent Web site or the Socialist Contingent Facebook page.

The two major parties have failed us. During the past two years, the Democrats and Republicans have failed to represent us, but they have done a fine job of representing the banks, insurance companies and corporations. They saved the banks for the bankers–not those whose homes are still threatened with foreclosure or collapsing value. They saved the auto industry for the auto CEOs–not for the workers whose plants have been closed, whose health insurance contributions have been raised and whose wages have been lowered. They have saved the health insurance companies by forcing millions of Americans to buy their policies, while denying us a single-payer plan and leaving prices remain uncontrolled. They have saved them, but they have not saved us.

We join the movement for this march, excited and enthused to see the labor unions, the African American and Latino populations, the women’s, gay and lesbian and environmental movements taking to the streets. But we know that change can only be brought about as it has been in every period of American history by independent social movements. And such independent movements must find political expression first in independent candidates and then in a party of working people and all in our society who suffer exploitation, discrimination and oppression.

The organizers of this march have called it “One Nation.” The truth is we are two nations. One nation of corporate CEOs and Bankers and their legions of high level executives, the very wealthy of our country, and another nation of working people, many of them now jobless. We are two nations: the corporations who run this country and the working people who make this country run. We will be marching with the working class to end a system dominated by corporations. We march because we believe that those working people who make the country run should run the country.

We know from American history and the history of the world that great and progressive changes come about only from below. We know that in modern times working people, who stand at the center of our economy and represent the majority of our population, represent the crucial force capable of making the changes we need. We also know that if we only organize movements and fail to create an independent political force, the Democrats will harvest all of our organizing. The fruits of our labor will be turned against us in Congress.

So we march. We march for jobs. We march for single-payer health care. We march for free public education from K to Ph.D. We march for an end to our racist and class-biased injustice system, and for equal justice for all. We march for women’s rights. We march for legalization of all the undocumented. We march for LGBT rights. We march for an end to the destruction of our environment. We march for an end to the U.S. wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. We march for an end to US support for Israel’s occupation of Palestine and blockade of Gaza. We march knowing that the things we march for can only be achieved by abolishing capitalism and creating a democratic socialist society. We invite you to march with us. Join the Socialist Contingent on October 2 in Washington, D.C.


ORGANIZATIONS:
Dan La Botz, Socialist Party campaign for U.S. Senate, Ohio
International Socialist Organization (ISO)
Solidarity: a democratic, revolutionary socialist, feminist, anti-racist organization
Socialist Alternative
Socialist Action
Socialist Party of New York City
Socialist Party of Central Virginia
Action for a Progressive Pakistan


PUBLICATIONS:
New Politics: A Journal of Socialist Thought


INDIVIDUALS (*Organizations listed for listed for identification purposes only):
Cindy Sheehan, “Peace Mom,” founder, Peace of the Action; Steve Early, author of Embedded With Organized Labor, National Writers Union/UAW member; Jerry Tucker, former member, UAW International Executive Board; Nativo Vigil Lopez, national president of the Mexican American Political Association; Fred Magdoff, author of The Great Financial Crisis and Professor Emeritus, University of Vermont; Mike Davis, author of Planet of Slums, Professor, Department of Creative Writing, U.C. Riverside; Camilo Mejía, Iraq war veteran and resister and member of IVAW; Naseer Aruri, author of Palestinian Refugees: The Right of Return and Chancellor Professor of Political Science (Emeritus), University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth; Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Joanne Landy, New Politics; Victor Agosto, Afghanistan war resister and member of IVAW; Billy Wharton, co-chairperson, Socialist Party USA; Jason Schulman, New Politics, Democratic Socialists of America National Political Committee; Paul Street, author of The Empire’s New Clothes: Barack Obama in the Real World of Power; Dave Zirin, sports editor of the Nation Magazine and author of A People’s History of Sports; David McReynolds, former chair of War Resisters International, Socialist Party USA presidential candidate in 1980 and 2000; Dahr Jamail, author Beyond the Green Zone, independent journalist; Anthony Arnove, author of Iraq Logic of Withdrawal, editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Michael Hirsch, New Politics: A Journal of Socialist Thought editorial board, member Democratic Socialists of America; Greg Albo, Socialist Project and York University; David McNally, professor of political science at York University; Sandy Boyer, co-host of WBAI’s Radio Free Eireann and campaigner to free Irish political prisoners, including the Guildford 4 and Birmingham 6; Sebastian Budgen, editorial board, Historical Materialism; Paul D’Amato, author of The Meaning of Marxism and managing editor of the International Socialist Review; Julie Fain, editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Sam Farber, retired professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College; Phil Gasper, editor of The Communist Manifesto: A Roadmap to History’s Most Important Political Document and editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Joel Geier, associate editor of the International Socialist Review; Thomas Harrison, New Politics; Ron Jacobs, author and library worker; Brian Jones, performer of Marx and Soho and editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Deepa Kumar, author of Outside the Box and member of AAUP-AFT, Rutgers*; Micah Landau, New Politics; Paul LeBlanc, antiwar activist and author of Marx, Lenin and the Revolutionary Experience; Jesse Lemisch, professor of History Emeritus, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York; Tom Lewis, editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Traven Leyshon, president, Green Mountain Labor Council*; Alan Maass, editor, SocialistWorker.org; Scott McLemee, New Politics; Nagesh Rao, Ph.D., assistant professor of English, The College of New Jersey, AFT Local 2364*; Bill Roberts, editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Jennifer Roesch, editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Herman Rosenfeld, Socialist Project and Labour Studies, McMaster University.; Eric Ruder, journalist for SocialistWorker.org and editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Kristin Schall, National Committee member, Socialist Party USA; Michael Schwartz, author of War Without End: The Iraq War in Context and professor of Sociology at State University of New York at Stony Brook; Helen Scott, editor of The Essential Rosa Luxemburg and editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Lance Selfa, author of The Democrats: A Critical History and editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Stephen R. Shalom, editorial board, New Politics; Ahmed Shawki, author of Black Liberation and Socialism and editor of the International Socialist Review; Ashley Smith, editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Sharon Smith, author of Subterranean Fire and Women and Socialism; Zelig Stern, labor commissioner, Socialist Party USA; Elizabeth Terzakis, editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Jeff Webber, author of From Rebellion to Reform in Bolivia, professor of Political Science at the University of Regina; Lois Weiner, New Politics; Chris Williams, author of Ecology and Socialism and adjunct professor of Chemistry and Physical Science, Pace University, NYC; Vice President, Union of Adjunct Faculty at Pace; NYSUT Local 37-960*; Sherry Wolf, author of Sexuality and Socialism and editorial board of the International Socialist Review; Julia Wrigley, New Politics; Annie Zirin, editorial board of the International Socialist Review

Categories
Communiqués

Prolegomena to Any Future Philosophy: Middlesex

May 11, 2010

source: http://socialismandorbarbarism.blogspot.com/search/label/occupation

Enemy of doxa, corrupter of youth, promulgator of discomfiting intuitions. That philosophy is unpalatable to the powers that be: this is not news to Socrates and his comrades.

Today it is no philosopher in particular, but philosophy itself that is ordered to drink the hemlock, sentenced to death for corrupting the capacity of what used to be called “the University” to turn greater profits. Philosophy is convicted of impiety before capital.

The present situation at Middlesex University makes the stakes excruciatingly clear. Even “excellence”—the preferred contemporary replacement for such antiquities as learning, knowledge, or thinking—is no longer enough. Even the “ranking” of a program is no matter, nor is its contribution to the reputation of the institution. Nor does it suffice that a program should sustain itself financially, or generate revenue. The operative question is simply: could MORE revenue be generated through its elimination? Could one, for example, restructure enrollment so as to swell Work Based Learning programs that draw lucrative funding from corporate sponsors? Could one get away with simply reallocating external grant funding already secured by the Center for Research in Modern European Philosophy (reportedly some £1 million through 2016) while eliminating the expense of actually running the Center? According to administrative logic, neither the international reputation of Middlesex Philosophy nor its financial solvency have any bearing upon the verdict that it makes “no measurable contribution” to the University. According to the calculus of greed and exploitation—the calculus of capital—philosophy at Middlesex, as Alex Williams rightly puts it, is worth more dead than alive.

What lessons are we to draw from this example? And what sort of a response might those lessons entail?

We might insist that philosophy is essential to the university—that only an institution which includes it answers to an acceptable vision of what the university should be. And we might then demand of wayward administrators the reversal of an “irrational” or “unethical” decision: the restoration of philosophy to its proper place at the core of any university worthy of the name. Or, on the other hand, we might find in the termination of philosophy the expression of an essential truth about the university’s role as a modern institution: to reproduce the relation between capital and labor—through the production of cultural capital when convenient, through the excision of cultural mediation when expedient.

The era of such expediency is everywhere upon us. Discussions of “The Crisis of the Humanities” proliferate at a dizzying pace. How can we proffer more compelling accounts of “what it is that we do” to administrators looking askance at abstruse investigations no longer even regarded as charming? Can we compete on a level playing field with the verifiable results of science and engineering by drawing up lists of our recent “discoveries”? Can we compete with the profit margins of private business schools embedded in public universities by insisting upon our invaluable contributions to civil society, our production of a thoughtful citizenry? How can we account for the worth of our teaching by metrics that calculate the value of programs according to higher, rather than lower, student/instructor ratios? How can we justify our existence, our form-of-life, in short, amid the unchecked reign of bureaucrats whose moral compass is neither the novel nor the Nicomachean Ethics but the consulting firm?

To its immeasurable credit, Middlesex Philosophy offers an alternative to both indignant pleading and professionalized handwringing: concrete resistance.

The students, staff, and faculty at Middlesex have opted to intervene in “the crisis of the humanities” by taking a common space of thought and practice with the determination to hold it. What inspires is the escalation of their radicalism in response to administrative obstinacy. First they occupied a boardroom to protest the cancellation of a meeting, seeking a proper explanation for the closure of their program. The next day they took the entire building, demanding a reversal of the decision. Today a red and black flag flies over the barricaded Mansion House at Middlesex, and thinkers from around the UK and continental Europe are travelling to the occupied Trent Park campus to participate in an open program of art, philosophy, and politics events called Transversal Space.

This sequence is a prolegomena to any future philosophy.

We cannot rely upon the goodwill of administrators and their consulting firms to uphold the grand tradition of the Academy, nor to offer wildlife preserves for modes of critical reflection that assuredly do not serve the interests of their species. We will not secure “the future of the humanities” by the authority of the better argument nor through appeals to a higher good than goods. If the very capacity for philosophical activity is to survive, then by any means necessary we will have to make it unprofitable to destroy the time and space of resolutely unproductive thought. What Middlesex augurs is that the 21st century is a time in which the material conditions of any possible thinking will have to be constructed, expropriated, and defended by common force.

Kant’s project, at the core of critical modernity, was to banish dogmatism by accounting for the conditions of any possible understanding. But now it is not critical reflection but rather the dogmatic operations of capital that pose the question, quid juris?, to philosophy. To subject Kant’s critical idealism to a materialist inversion, today, is to recognize that the conditions of any possible philosophical reflection—reflection upon conditions of possible understanding, or anything else—will depend upon material powers of resistance, the construction of times, spaces, and forms of life capable of holding their own against the vacuity of philosophy’s erasure.

“The philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it.” The present crisis of the relation of philosophy to capital means that philosophers will have to change the world in order to interpret it. It is not that philosophy will be obviated by the real movement of history, the coming-into-being of communism, but rather that communization is now the pre-condition of any possible philosophy.

“In the sphere of this faculty you can determine either everything or nothing,” writes Kant in the preface to the Prolegomena. From California, to Puerto Rico, to London, to Zagreb, to Greece: We Want Everything.

Nathan Brown
English
University of California, Davis

Marija Cetini?
Comparative Literature
University of Southern California

Gopal Balakrishnan
History of Consciounsess
University of California, Santa Cruz

Aaron Benanav
History
University of California, Los Angeles

Jasper Bernes
English
University of California, Berkeley

Chris Chen
English
University of California, Berkeley

Joshua Clover
English
University of California, Davis

Maya Gonzalez
History of Consciousness
University of California, Santa Cruz

Timothy Kreiner
English
University of California, Davis

Laura Martin
History
University of California, Santa Cruz

Jason Smith
Art Center College of Design
Pasadena

Evan Calder Williams
Literature
University of California, Santa Cruz